- Published on
Boolean Query in Elasticsearch
- Authors
 - Name
- Bowen Y
 
 
The difference between must clause and filter clause
The must and filter clauses within a boolean query in Elasticsearch have distinct roles and behaviors:
- mustClause:- Purpose: The mustclause is used to specify search criteria that must be met for a document to be included in the search results.
- Behavior: Queries in the mustclause contribute to the scoring of the document. This means that matching documents are not only required to match the criteria specified in themustclause but their relevance score is also influenced by how well they match these criteria.
- Use Case: Use the mustclause for conditions that are essential for the search and where the degree of matching affects the relevance of the document.
 
- Purpose: The 
- filterClause:- Purpose: The filterclause is used to apply a filter to the search results without affecting the scoring.
- Behavior: Queries in the filterclause do not contribute to the scoring of documents. They are used purely to include or exclude documents based on the filter criteria. Documents either match the filter or they don't.
- Use Case: Use the filterclause for conditions that are binary (a document either meets the condition or it doesn't) and when you do not need the condition to influence the relevance score.
 
- Purpose: The 
In summary, the must clause affects both the inclusion of documents in the search results and their relevance scoring, while the filter clause affects only the inclusion of documents, without impacting their scoring. The choice between must and filter can also have performance implications, as filters can be cached for faster execution in subsequent queries.
